![]() Ready for macOS 11.0 Big Sur, Fusion 12 supports macOS 10.15 Catalina and includes new features for developers, IT admins and everyday users. ![]() So my answer to your question is either is fine for most folks. VMware Fusion delivers the best way to run Windows on the Mac, and the ultimate development and testing tool for building apps to run on any platform. For anything requiring GPU power you can't beat simply booting into Windows and not using a VM of course. I must say for me EUFI support will be nice to have in the new versions when running EFI repair utilities on attached Windows boot drives after cloning them. Competition is good so i am glad they are both out there. In the end you are using them to run Windows so the Mac interface starts to be a non issue pretty quickly so the difference are more to do with the under the hood issues. Both are just fine, Parallels may be slightly more leaning to being a tad more Mac friendly. I'm not necessarily asking which is better, just from anyone who uses both if one does something the others don't. È supportata unampia gamma di programmi: dalle suite generiche per la produttività come Microsoft Office ai programmi a uso intensivo di grafica come AutoCAD o SolidWorks, che. Quasi tutti i programmi eseguiti su questi sistemi operativi funzionano con VMware Fusion. ![]() ![]() I don't mean to start a pissing match, but are there things VMware can do that Parallels cannot? I use Parallels everyday at work, but I'm just curious as to if one does something better than the other. VMware Fusion consente di eseguire macOS, Windows, Linux e altri sistemi operativi basati su x86 come macchine virtuali. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |